<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Web OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justin.harmonize.fm/index.php/2008/09/the-web-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justin.harmonize.fm/index.php/2008/09/the-web-os/</link>
	<description>A cup of coffee and a soapbox is like a bottle of Jack and a gun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://justin.harmonize.fm/index.php/2008/09/the-web-os/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justin.harmonize.fm/?p=35#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I agree that it&#039;ll never be standard across all sites. However, I think that if there was a standard that most web applications followed, it would go a long way in not only encouraging new web apps to follow it, but to enhancing the overall usability of the web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a divide in how the web is used. It is still predominantly used as a publishing platform. These guys should be able to do whatever they want. There&#039;s nothing that complicated going on and creativity is a lot more important.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rich web applications, however, are a different story. Applications that are taking desktop functionality and moving it to the web can benefit a lot from a standardized interface. They are the ones that should be pushed to some published standard. Of course, they need to be convinced that it needs to exist in such numbers to make it seem like a standard. That&#039;s a tough battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#39;ll never be standard across all sites. However, I think that if there was a standard that most web applications followed, it would go a long way in not only encouraging new web apps to follow it, but to enhancing the overall usability of the web.</p>
<p>There is a divide in how the web is used. It is still predominantly used as a publishing platform. These guys should be able to do whatever they want. There&#39;s nothing that complicated going on and creativity is a lot more important.</p>
<p>Rich web applications, however, are a different story. Applications that are taking desktop functionality and moving it to the web can benefit a lot from a standardized interface. They are the ones that should be pushed to some published standard. Of course, they need to be convinced that it needs to exist in such numbers to make it seem like a standard. That&#39;s a tough battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://justin.harmonize.fm/index.php/2008/09/the-web-os/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justin.harmonize.fm/?p=35#comment-13</guid>
		<description>That was an excellent post.  I don&#039;t, however, think standarding an interface will ever happen.  Like you said, the web&#039;s expressive power is really tough to move against.  The entire industry of web design runs counter to the idea of standardizing an interface.  Coders would love to have a standard, but designers would hate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thought I had was the limiting factor of the browser.  The only thing I&#039;m aware of to combat this is Google Gears.  I don&#039;t have any experience with it, but I do know it aims to basically make the browser more powerful without compromising any of the &quot;security&quot; of allowing local storage access.  Maybe in a few years that technology will be farther along and we can finally make the web a dominant, usable, consistent experience for applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an excellent post.  I don&#39;t, however, think standarding an interface will ever happen.  Like you said, the web&#39;s expressive power is really tough to move against.  The entire industry of web design runs counter to the idea of standardizing an interface.  Coders would love to have a standard, but designers would hate it.</p>
<p>One thought I had was the limiting factor of the browser.  The only thing I&#39;m aware of to combat this is Google Gears.  I don&#39;t have any experience with it, but I do know it aims to basically make the browser more powerful without compromising any of the &#8220;security&#8221; of allowing local storage access.  Maybe in a few years that technology will be farther along and we can finally make the web a dominant, usable, consistent experience for applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

